My response to Antonio Baduy Cámara, and the blog Skeptical Raptor, as to their response to 9 Questions For The Pro-Vaxer's
These are the replies to the said nine questions, and as written by Antonio Baduy Cámara, a “pro-vaxxer” who resides in Mexico.
Lets go, and here we go.
The nine vaccine questions
Question 1 – Where are the safety studies regarding the vaccine safety of the current CDC vaccine schedule?
Here there is no direct link to ANY study whatsoever that directly answers the question, as to your reply.. It is nothing but a false smoke screen. And you certainly as well do nothing as to answering the question by simply saying, "Try Pubmed" Obviously, that has already been done. Try it ...again.
Question 2 – Where are the vaccine safety studies regarding the known practice of injecting a small child with from five and up to nine or more vaccines, in a single day and office visit?
The SR reply states. First of all, no, no child gets 9 or more vaccines per visit, unless you count the individual component of each vaccine, and secondly, that’s rare. For the first year schedule, go (hyperlinked again) here. More information on the myth that the schedule is not tested can be found (hyperlinked) with the word, here.
In those two links existed exactly this linked as here and here, first was from an assumed as so trust worth, Pedicatrics publication. Included in that study was as well a study from already years ago, claiming that injecting Thimerosal in vaccines actually improved the neurological test scores of some children. Totally preposterous and nothing but junk science. And children do get injected with from 5 and up to nine more vaccines in a single day. Got to vactruth.com for as well the many stories of those children who have been, and as to the outcome. The reply made to this question clearly contains nothing but complete denial.
In that said study piece, it as well proclaims that in 2012, that the Institute of Medicine examined the body of studies relating to the entire childhood vaccine schedule. While the review recommended a more systematic study of the entire schedule, its conclusion was clear: This is false information and because the IOM as well concluded in that study of their acceptable studies, that no yet needed studies had been done regarding several issues, and to include that of injecting multiple vaccines. So again the same JUNK science has again had it day, right here.
The said article goes on to say this. In other words, the committee recommended more research not because there was evidence supporting concerns raised – there wasn’t – but to remove the cause of concern, the perception of a problem.
And the reply states. What we see is that there is no one magic study of the entire schedule; but there are many studies that examine it from multiple directions, and that examine vaccine combinations compared to individual vaccines and compared to the general population. As explained by Allison Hagood at Red Wine and Applesauce:
So what they are actually saying again in that IOM study of the acceptable studies, is that the needed and necessary vaccine safety studies have never been done. Yet they maintain that the known corrupt studies that they have done regarding individual vaccines such as the MMR, and as well the vaccine ingredient Thimerosal, seem to show no existing problem. Again see, What Do The Epidemiological Studies Really Tell Us; (and for a well done analysis of those 14 to 16 known epidemiological studies). http://www.rescuepost.com/files/vaccines-and-autism-epidemiology-rebuttal.pdf
In fact, NONE of the vaccine safety study questions I have put forth, have ever been answered by the known 2013 IOM report on vaccine safety, and/or any other, or earlier report. My study questions are included in this post.
In this report it stated this as well.
The Childhood Immunization Schedule and Safety Stakeholder Concerns, Scientific
Evidence, and Future Studies (1)
The IOM Assessment of Studies of Health Outcomes Related to the Recommended Childhood Immunization Schedule – 2013
[This committee’s report is unique in that it is the first to attempt to examine the entire childhood
immunization schedule as it exists today.
In this most comprehensive examination of the immunization schedule to date, the IOM committee uncovered no evidence of major safety concerns associated with adherence to the childhood immunization schedule, which should help to reassure a diverse group of stakeholders.]
...That claim is an obvious and blatant ...LIE. No such thing actually took place. So, you are not off the hook, just that easily, and you need to face that reality. Go and actually find in that IOM report any studies that have been done and/or any reference to any of those studies that I outlined and requested; and in and as to that kind of study research, ever having been done? It has clearly not ever been done. They already know or suspect what the result will be, and that is why that kind of vaccine safety study, it is never done. (2)
This is what these reports ACTUALLY state, and just as I previously said, and directly pointed out.. No adequate level of vaccine safety studies have EVER been done. So here, the question has not yet been answered. Try again.
The committee’s literature searches and review were intended to identify
health outcomes associated with some aspect of the childhood immunization
schedule. Allergy and asthma, autoimmunity, autism, other
neurodevelopmental disorders (e.g., learning disabilities, tics, behavioral
disorders, and intellectual disabilities), seizures, and epilepsy were included
as search terms. Furthermore, the committee reviewed papers on immunization
and premature infants.
In summary, few studies have comprehensively assessed the association
between the entire immunization schedule or variations in the overall
schedule and categories of health outcomes, and no study has directly examined
health outcomes and stakeholder concerns in precisely the way that
the committee was charged to address in its statement of task. No studies
have compared the differences in health outcomes that some stakeholders
questioned between entirely unimmunized populations of children and fully
6 THE CHILDHOOD IMMUNIZATION SCHEDULE AND SAFETY
immunized children. Experts who addressed the committee pointed not to a
body of evidence that had been overlooked but rather to the fact that existing
research has not been designed to test the entire immunization schedule.
Continued as to my reply: There as well were no studies and no evidence found of any studies I specifically stated and requested in the document known as; Adverse Events Associated with Childhood Vaccines: Evidence Bearing on Casuality
This said IOM report used to be available for free and open access, without a download process. If their information is so true, and so important, why is it not published for public access? So why is it today not available in that form? Shouldn't they want the public to know what that said report, actually states? At the CDC site, they as well hyperlink to this said study, but the link is a dead link. Why is that, and the below is what it states.
This site can’t be reached
www.iom.edu’s ...server DNS address could not be found.
Read the full report, (hyperlinked to currently, nothing there)
In summary as well: The first linked to study as to the number 2 question, is again obvious junk science.
On-time Vaccine Receipt in the First Year Does Not Adversely Affect Neuropsychological Outcomes
Part two of the linked to study regarding this said question, only links to an article by the known corrupt, Dorit Rubinstein Reiss. Additionally, Reiss is also member of the Parent Advisory Board of Voices for Vaccines, another pharma front group that is know to entirely disregard the issues as to the safety of vaccines. This again links not to actual studies but linked to again only opinion article pieces produced within the blogging site of so called, Skeptical Raptor.
Debunking myths about vaccine testing and safety
Dorit's blogging and article replying information is clearly no better than that of Hillary Clinton, as to her corruption, deception, and lying. She as well promotes vaccines, without a single thought about the serious nature of vaccine injuries, and as well at times, resulting deaths.
Who Is Dorit Reiss?
DOHrit “The Bully Troll” Reiss
The Lady Doth Protest Too Much: Voices for Vaccine is a Top-down Front Operation Launched by a CDC Partner in 2008
"Not Paid To Post?" Really? Dorit Rubinstein Reiss
Voices for Vaccines III: The Opinions and Silences of Dorit Reiss
Voices for Vaccine is a Top-down Front Operation Launched by a CDC Partner in 2008
The Ties That Bind
Try it ...again!!!
Question 3 – Where are the vaccine safety studies in regard to the safety of injecting vaccine aluminum adjuvants?
Here they in the SR reply hyperlink lists only one example. Lets take a look.
Here they list a study comparing dietary exposure to aluminum verses injected vaccine exposure, and they again entirely disregard the fact that dietary exposure is NOT the same thing as injected vaccine exposure, so again the study is entirely null and void as to any real comparisons. Again, and as I said the actually needed vaccine safety studies, have NEVER been done. That was my point as well in creating these said nine questions.
Vaccine. 2011 Nov 28;29(51):9538-43. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.09.124. Epub 2011 Oct 11.
Updated aluminum pharmacokinetics following infant exposures through diet and vaccination.
No more need be said, because and as always dietary exposure is clearly not biologically or physiologically the same as injected exposure.
Try it ...again.
Question 4 – Where are the vaccine safety studies regarding the practice of injecting both vaccines with attenuated live viruses in them, together with as well killed vaccines with aluminum adjuvants in them.
Here in the SR reply is it claimed that, Most vaccines are tested against the current schedule to check if there aren’t any ill effects from them. Or you can look right here. Or you can check this out again. And with again three hyperlinks. Lets take a look at this obvious smoke screen of false claims.
The first study they link to again, is a so trusted Pediatrics study article.
CONCLUSIONS: Timely vaccination during infancy has no adverse effect on neuropsychological outcomes 7 to 10 years later. These data may reassure parents who are concerned that children receive too many vaccines too soon.
Second reference is a study called, Environ Health Perspect; DOI:10.1289/ehp.1408257
Examination of the Safety of Pediatric Vaccine Schedules in a Non-Human Primate Model: Assessments of Neurodevelopment, Learning, and Social Behavior
Just MORE junk science that again flies again in the face of the real initial Dr Wakefield's primate studies at the University of Pittsburgh, as to contract he had to continue those primate studies for some years. Of course they had to destroy him as to that outcome, and as we all know well the attack that ensued in the effort to keep his studies out of any mainline impact health care, and/or big pharma directed journal.
Conclusions: This comprehensive 5-year case–control study, which closely examined the effects of pediatric vaccines on early primate development, provided no consistent evidence of neurodevelopmental deficits or aberrant behavior in vaccinated animals.
More obvious JUNK science, BS, and LIES.
Third link is nothing but a link to an SR article titled, titled, Debunking myths about vaccine testing and safety. Written by none other than the known corrupt, Dorit Reiss. Additionally, Reiss is also member of the Parent Advisory Board of Voices for Vaccines, and other known Paul Offit and Big Pharma vaccine promotional front group. The article link hyperlinks again through a series of opinion article pieces as well written by Dorit Reese, claiming that vaccine maker clinical trials are sufficient as to vaccine safety, and the rest of the studies mainly address only resulting vaccine titers, and NOT actual vaccine safety.
Question 5 – Where are the studies showing the vaccine safety of vaccines which are contaminated with human diploid cell short and long chain DNA contaminants, due to the use of human diploid tissue in the growing of the vaccine antigens in childhood vaccines? Where are the vaccine safety studies in regard to any other vaccine that has been known to be contaminated with the substances that the vaccine antigen was grown on, and from?
Here the SR reply is claiming that, For the DNA thing, most vaccine studies which compare vaccines vs placebo are enough. The truth is that no vaccine during clinical trials is ever compared as to systemic effects with a true placebo. The second fact is that during clinical trials no issue of vaccine contamination is EVER seriously looked at, and/or ever seriously studied. In fact is it entirely ignored. So again the answer reply comes up with absolutely no studies that have shown vaccine safety as to the issue of vaccine contamination.
In fact the reply states exactly this, and which is a false claim. For the DNA thing, most vaccine studies which compare vaccines vs placebo are enough. They are everywhere. Just look at all of the links above and below. And check out this article about DNA transfer to humans – it just doesn’t happen.
First of all, what links above and below, as none of them address this said issue?
Quite obviously the issue of vaccine contamination is a very serious issue, and both the FDA and the CDC know that. The problem is that they have no way to resolve it. There is no way to clean up the disgusting crud that those vaccines are made from, and no matter what the so called purification process. This as well has been a known issue since the polio vaccine.
Look what they have found at Sound Choice Pharmaceutical Institute in Washington state, in regard to vaccine contamination produced by use of aborted fetal cell tissue, perhaps better known as fetal stem cell tissue.
Vaccine Production With - Human Diploid cells (aborted fetal cell tissue)
INDESCRIBABLY DISGUSTING VACCINE INGREDIENTS
SO WHAT ABOUT THE FLY IN OUR SOUP?
It may not do any harm at all, especially if it has been well heated in the soup!
However, all injected substances including insect fragments bypass the body’s intricate defense mechanism. The same substances which are harmless when ingested are shown to be extremely detrimental to health when injected. This is learned by medical students and others, but many doctors, health authorities and other vaccine promoters appear to ignore this basic fact.
More, vaccine contamination.
Millions of Children Infected with 'Vaccine Safety Experts' Rotateq Vaccine: Dr. Paul Offit
Unfortunately for Dr. Offit (not so affectionately named Dr. Profit), a 2010 study published in Journal of Virology revealed that his multi-million dollar grossing patent on the Rotateq vaccine contains a live simian retrovirus (with a 96% match of certainty) that has likely infected millions of children over the past few years with a virus that causes great harm. Retrovirus infections are permanent, and can carry on indefinitely into future generations. In other words, once they are inserted into the human genome they can not be removed. View the entire PDF here.
Moreover, a 2014 study published in Advances in Virology found Dr. Offit's vaccine contains a "a baboon endogenous virus strain M7...likely due to the monkey cell line in which RotaTeq was produced from." View the entire PDF here.
VACCINE CONTAMINATION: A THREAT TO HUMAN HEALTH
The Emerging Risks of Live Virus &
Virus Vectored Vaccines:
Vaccine Strain Virus Infection, Shedding & Transmission
Try it ...again.
Question 6 – Where are the vaccinated verses entirely un-vaccinated health outcome studies? Thousands of children still exist in the US, with active vaccine exemptions. The Amish community as well have had thousands of un-vaccinated children within their communities. Just because a small group of Amish were falsely fear mongered into vaccinating and ended up at a clinic in the attempt to diagnose and treat resulting childhood autism; does not mean that the entire Amish community vaccinates, and has been falsely eluded to. Obviously there is no need to not vaccinate, simply to do this study.
SR reply. Debunked here. Moreover, the claims about the Amish not vaccinating is, in fact, incorrect. The Amish vaccinate less, but they do vaccinate.
You do NOT have ANY evidence that the Amish do vaccinate. A small portion of the Amish do allow some vaccine but certainly they do not allow any of them the complete CDC vaccine schedule. This as well is not a fully vaccinated verses entirely un-vaccinated, health outcomes study. Only more smoke and mirrors.
The only study you came up with was this.
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2011 Feb; 108(7): 99–104.
Vaccination Status and Health in Children and Adolescents
Findings of the German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Children and Adolescents (KiGGS)
The prevalence of allergic diseases and non-specific infections in children and adolescents was not found to depend on vaccination status.
Actually the said Kriggs study showed exactly the opposite to be true, than what you are claiming.
State of health of unvaccinated children
This what real studies regarding that issue, look like.
Studies comparing vaccinated to unvaccinated populations
Study: Vaccinated Children Have 2 to 5 Times More Diseases and Disorders Than Unvaccinated Children
Studies Outside the U.S. Show Unvaccinated Children Healthier than Vaccinated Children
Try it ...again!!!!
Question 7 – In regard to the MMR vaccine. How does the CDC as well continue to ignore this long list of studies showing the harmful effects of, the vaccine injury effects of; and as well in these studies there as well appears be an obvious MMR connection to autism? The controversy does not only revolve around a single 1998 study by Wakefield, and as well a single study connected to the CDC’s, William Thompson. And the so called official word that they tell you is that any vaccine/autism link has been disproven, and debunked; right? Really? Lets look further.
SR reply: Because actual scientific research demonstrates that autism starts in the womb and probably cannot happen outside. Huge epidemiological studies have found no increased autism rates in any group either – see reviews of the depth of scientific evidence that affirmatively shows no link between vaccines and autism. And, there is a body of research that specifically refutes the claimed link between the MMR vaccine and autism.
What a LOAD of complete garbage, and there are no real studies and no large scale study research to show that. If there were, Paul Offit would be all over it, and he is not.
N Engl J Med. 2014 Mar 27;370(13):1209-19. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1307491.
Patches of disorganization in the neocortex of children with autism.
In this small, explorative study, we found focal disruption of cortical laminar architecture in the cortexes of a majority of young children with autism. Our data support a probable dysregulation of layer formation and layer-specific neuronal differentiation at prenatal developmental stages. (Funded by the Simons Foundation and others.)
What about all the pregnant woman who have been injected with Thimerosal containing vaccines? How about those they have added that get the aluminum adjuvant containing DTaP vaccine?
Warning to Pregnant Mothers - Toxic Dose of Aluminum in the Tdap, Dr Paul Thomas, Pediatrician
Vaccine aluminum adjuvant causation of neuroglial activation and neuroinflammation in the brain of patients with autism- Page 2
And again, what did they study in those so called and claimed to larger epidemiological, (population based), vaccine safety studies? In fact they only studied one single vaccine, the MMR; and one single vaccine ingredient, Thimerosal. None of the larger epidemiological studies compared vaccinated to entirely un-vaccinated. None of the studies looked at the safety profile of the entire CDC vaccine schedule. None of those studies as well looked at the safety profile of giving from 5 to up to 9 vaccines or more to and infant or small child, in a single day and office visit.
Every one of the larger MMR, and Thimerosal epidemiological studies were clearly COOKED, for the results, period. Found were the use of flawed study designs, use of unreliable data, predetermined outcomes unsupported by the data, and as well major conflicts of interest in the studies funding sources; none of them being independent and nor unbiased.
Again, VACCINES AND AUTISM – WHAT DO EPIDEMIOLOGICAL STUDIES REALLY TELL US?
A well done and full analysis of those studies, right here. Find out why they are nothing but junk science
Try it ...again.
Question 8 – Can you explain how it is possible in regard to the comparisons of systemic adverse reactions, for the FDA in the review and in the approval of vaccines through clinical trials, to allow the substitution of saline placebo, a replacement such as other similar vaccines which the FDA has previously approved as safe?
SR reply: Yes, they try to test for immune reactions, adjuvants are generally safe, so the only difference is the active component, which is the antigen in the vaccine, they check for the safety of that. Then again, many vaccines are tested against real saline placebos, showing that they are safe. That, too, was addressed here.
My reply; this so called supporting reference is just more false opinion trash from a SR blogging article, titled, Debunking myths about vaccine testing and safety. And we have already been over this.
Then as to the same number 2 question it goes into a full blown making FALSE excuses blizzard of complete BS, as to why vaccines are not tested against a true saline placebo. Anyone with any honesty knows that the only reason systemic effects of vaccines are not tested against a true injected saline placebo, is to create a smoke screen of interference as to what is really going on with the outcome of vaccine clinical trials; and there is absolutely no way of explaining away, and making denial of that obvious fact. And no, during the clinical trials regarding Gardasil, no true placebo was ever used in comparison of the systemic effects. The ONLY true saline placebo that was used, was only in comparison of the injection site comparison outcomes. It is all in the over 400 page document that Merck submitted to the FDA, regarding their Gardasil clinical trials.
Then as well as to question 2 there is a an ongoing reference to just another SR blogging article titled, Debunking myths about vaccine testing and safety, and which again is nothing but a Dorit Rubstein Reiss written, article; and which links as well to only a series of other SR written blogging articles. Seriously, and you actually want me to again waste my time with this trash, and which contains nothing more than again the known same old known pro-vaccine propaganda, and nothing but a collage of hyperlinks, to nothing new? Where directly are the studies I asked for? Obviously you don't have them, but for a further smoke screen.
Gardasil has been the most reactive vaccine since the old DPT vaccine, and it has left 1000 of young ladies with disabled neurological conditions, which are NOT a coincidence. In fact once the aluminum adjuvant in Gardasil is injected, autopsy studies have shown that the combination aluminum adjuvant with the existing and known HPV DNA contaminant now known to be firmly attached to the aluminum adjuvant in the vaccine; that combination never leaves the body, and is found in the blood, brain, and internal organs of the body. Much of it was referenced to in my references on the page that I submitted these question on, and of course which you have entirely ignored, and in such a cowardly manner refused to actually link to my actual page, when you attempted to answer these 9 questions.
And you even have the audacity to say that, "Liability protection doesn’t undermine safety"? What a LOAD of obvious misinformation filled, and in denial ...trash. Nothing further needs be said, and nor as to your low level of credibility.
Gardasil-The Flagship Example of the Failure of Vaccine Authorities to Regulate and Assure Vaccine Safety
“HPV Vaccine Has Done This to My Child” -"I am NOT a Coincidence"
As well there were MANY studies in the reference section on my 9 questions page in regard to the Gardasil issue, and again which you ignored and refused to reference to even as much as that page. Yet you allow yourself to present again with your junk science in answering these 9 questions; while refusing the evidence of the studies I presented with. I would call that being extremely biased. So what are you afraid of, in actually posting my nine questions page, which you are attempting to respond to, here? Hiding information is not conclusive to providing the evidence of having credibility in your case, and just so you know.
Try it ...again!!!
Question 9 - Question 9 – Are you aware of the fact that SV40 a known contaminant in the early 1960’s polio vaccine, is still being found in children today, and which are to young to have ever had that known contaminated vaccine? SV40 is as well known to cause benign tumors, and cancer. Are you as well aware of the fact that vaccines today still contain the unresolved risk of there being contaminants in them that can cause and create adverse health effects? Contaminants from any once living animal, or human cell source, on which the vaccine antigens were grown on and from.
Here the SR reply states, this.
Again, there is no evidence that cancer rates increased when infected with SV40 – and there is no evidence that SV40 is a cause for cancer in humans. None of the alleged contaminations in vaccines turned out to be an issue. See, for example, analyses of ingredients in the HPV vaccines – here, here and here.
My reply is this. If you only go the sanctioned provaccine sites and studies, of course no information will be found as to the not only the cancer causing effect of the green monkey contaminant SV40 in the previous polio vaccine, but as well its benign tumor causing capability. Plenty of non biased information and studies have shown the connection between SV40 and cancer, and refusing that information, certainly does not provide an answer to question 9.
CDC ‘Disappears’ Page Linking Polio Vaccines To Cancer-Causing Viruses
The original CDC pages stated above, now deleted from the CDC site.
Cancer, Simian Virus 40 (SV40), and Polio Vaccine Fact Sheet
Frequently Asked Questions about Cancer, Simian Virus 40 (SV40), and Polio Vaccine
SV-40 Deadly Cure
Simian virus 40 DNA found in US children:
Simian virus 40 is present in most United States human
mesotheliomas, but it is rarely present in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
Simian virus in polio shots tied to cancer / Two studies support widely disputed theory
Some oral poliovirus vaccines were contaminated with infectious SV40 after 1961.
“Like other polyomaviruses, SV40 is a DNA virus that has been found to cause tumors and cancer,” explains RealFarmacy.com. “SV40 is believed to suppress the transcriptional properties of the tumor-suppressing genes in humans through the SV40 Large T-antigen and SV40 Small T-antigen. Mutated genes may contribute to uncontrolled cellular proliferation, leading to cancer.”
How Much of Our Cancer Epidemic is Due to SV-40?
The Polio Vaccine Cancer Cover-up -SV40
Fisher SG, et al. Anticancer Res. 1999 May-Jun.
Cancer risk associated with simian virus 40 contaminated polio vaccine.
BACKGROUND: The presence of SV40 in monkey cell cultures used in the preparation of the polio vaccine from 1955 through 1961 is well documented. Investigations have consistently demonstrated the oncogenic behavior of SV40 in animal models. Early epidemiologic studies were inadequate in demonstrating an increase in cancer incidence associated with contaminated vaccine. Recently, investigators have provided persuasive evidence that SV40 is present in human ependymomas, choroid plexus tumors, bone tumors, and mesotheliomas, however, the etiologic role of the virus in tumorigenesis has not been established.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using data from SEER, we analyzed the incidence of brain tumors, bone tumors, and mesotheliomas from 1973-1993 and the possible relationship of these tumors with the administration of the SV40 contaminated vaccine.
RESULTS: Our analysis indicates increased rates of ependymomas (37%), osteogenic sarcomas (26%), other bone tumors (34%) and mesothelioma (90%) among those in the exposed as compared to the unexposed birth cohort.
CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that there may be an increased incidence of certain cancers among the 98 million persons exposed to contaminated polio vaccine in the U.S.; further investigations are clearly justified.
Cancer. 2015 Aug 1;121(15):2618-26. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29404. Epub 2015 Apr 15.
Immunologic evidence of a strong association between non-Hodgkin lymphoma and simian virus 40.
Our data indicate a strong association between NHL and SV40 and thus a need for innovative therapeutic approaches for this hematologic malignancy.© 2015 American Cancer Society.
Association between SV40 and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma
We conclude that SV40 is significantly associated with some types of NHL and that lymphomas should be added to the types of human cancers associated with SV40.
Significant association between human osteosarcoma and simian virus 40
"The data from the current study indicate an association between OS and SV40. These data could be transferred to clinical applications for innovative therapies to address SV40-positive OS. Cancer 2014. © 2014 American Cancer Society...http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25377935
Carcinogenesis. 2014 Feb;35(2):407-14. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgt322. Epub 2013 Oct 15.
Long-term exposure of mesothelial cells to SV40 and asbestos leads to malignant transformation and chemotherapy resistance.
SV-40 Deadly Cure
And here is the proof the SV40 is as well contagious. Meaning now that we will never be rid of SV40 in our population.
Simian virus 40 in humans
Advances in Virus Research, Volume 50
Pages 83 and 84, read. (Also see the study titled, Simian virus 40 in humans, below on this page)
Moreover, blood and sperm fluid may represent important means for spreading of SV40 in humans.
Indeed in these investigations, (Martini etal;, 1995,1996) 61% of the neoplastic patients positive for SV 40 sequences were of an age excluding exposure to SV 40-contaminated polio vaccines, suggesting contagious transmission of SV 40 by horizontal infection.
Infectious Agents and Cancer
To date, the prevalence of SV40 infections in humans is not known. Recent studies, based on PCR and serological techniques, indicate that SV40 infection occurs both in children and adults. (i) SV40 DNA sequences have been detected in normal and neoplastic tissues of people either too young (1 to 30 years) or too old (60 to 85 years) to have been vaccinated with SV40-contaminated anti-polio vaccines [19,33,76-81]. This finding may also explain the lack of difference in cancer incidence between individuals vaccinated with SV40-contaminated and SV40-free anti-polio vaccines . (ii) SV40 sequences and Tag were detected in blood and sperm specimens from normal individuals and oncologic patients [80,81,83-88] and in lymphoblastoid cells . These results suggest that (peripheral blood mononuclear cells) PBMCs, could be a reservoir and vehicle of SV40 spreading in the tissues of the host and among the individuals. (iii) SV40 sequences were found in urine and stoole samples, from children and adults [84,89,90], indicating that the haematic, sexual and orofecal routes of transmission are likely to be responsible for SV40 horizontal infection in humans.
So, this is good and normal thing; and you see no issues, whatsoever? Really?
Review Open Access
Simian virus 40 in humans
Simian virus 40 (SV40) is a monkey virus that was administered to human populations by contaminated vaccines which were produced in SV40 naturally infected monkey cells.
Recent molecular biology and epidemiological studies suggest that SV40 may be contagiously transmitted in humans by horizontal infection, independently from the earlier administration of SV40-contaminated vaccines.
SV40 footprints in humans have been found associated at high prevalence with specific tumor types such as brain and bone tumors, mesotheliomas and lymphomas and with kidney diseases, and at lower prevalence in blood samples from healthy donors.
Contrasting reports appeared in the literature on the circulation of SV40 in humans by contagious transmission and its association, as a possible etiologic cofactor, with specific human tumors. As a consequence of the conflicting results, a considerable debate has developed in the scientific community. In the present review we consider the main results obtained by different groups investigating SV40 sequences in human tumors and in blood specimens, the putative role of SV40 in the onset/progression of specific human tumors, and comment on the hypotheses arising from these data.
Leuk Lymphoma. 2003;44 Suppl 3:S33-9.
Association between SV40 and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
Millions of people worldwide were inadvertently exposed to live simian virus 40 (SV40) between 1955 and 1963 through immunization with SV40-contaminated polio vaccines. Although the prevalence of SV40 infections in humans is not known, numerous studies suggest that SV40 is a pathogen resident in the human population today. SV40 is a potent DNA tumor virus that is known to induce primary brain cancers, bone cancers, mesotheliomas, and lymphomas in laboratory animals. SV40 oncogenesis is mediated by the viral large tumor antigen (T-ag), which inactivates the tumor suppressor proteins p53 and pRb. During the last decade, independent studies using different molecular biology techniques have shown the presence of SV40 DNA, T-ag, or other viral markers in primary human brain and bone cancers and malignant mesotheliomas. Evidence suggests that there may be geographic differences in the frequency of these virus-positive tumors. Recent large independent controlled studies have shown that SV40 T-ag DNA is significantly associated with human non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). In our study, we analyzed systemic NHL from 76 HIV-1-positive and 78 HIV-1-negative patients, and nonmalignant lymphoid samples from 79 HIV-1-positive and 107 HIV-1-negative patients without tumors; 54 colon and breast carcinoma samples served as cancer controls. We used polymerase chain reaction (PCR) followed by Southern blot hybridization and DNA sequence analysis to detect DNAs of polyomaviruses and herpesviruses. SV40-specific DNA sequences were detected in 64 (42%) of 154 NHL, none of 186 nonmalignant lymphoid samples, and none of 54 control cancers. For NHL from HIV-1-positive patients, 33% contained SV40 DNA and 39% Epstein Barr virus (EBV) DNA, whereas NHLs from HIV-1-negative patients were 50% positive for SV40 and 15% positive for EBV. Few tumors were positive for both SV40 and EBV. Human herpesvirus type 8 was not detected. SV40 sequences were found most frequently in diffuse large B cell and follicular-type lymphomas. We conclude that SV40 is significantly associated with some types of NHL and that lymphomas should be added to the types of human cancers associated with SV40.
Simian virus 40 DNA found in US children:
Simian Virus 40 Sequences in Human Lymphoblastoid B-Cell Lines:
Types of SV40 Associated Cancers:
Simian Virus 40 (SV40):
A Cancer Causing Monkey Virus
from FDA-Approved Vaccines
The SV40 Virus: Has Tainted Polio Vaccine Caused An Increase in Cancer?
Contamination of Cell Cultures
Bovine contaminants of vaccine cell cultures
The Polio Vaccine Myth
And I could go much more in depth than this, and in using the FDA's own resources, as to what they know.
Try it ...again.
At the ending of this supposed answering of the said nine question, it states this.
So, Lowell Hubbs, are those answer to your nine vaccine questions good enough?
My answer: Well no, it certainly is NOT good enough and because again you never produced any real answers, and nor any real studies to counter my claims and nor the 9 questions that I put forth. It is just the same old smoke scree as always,and you thought you would and could get away with it.
At the end of the answer section on this SR page it states. This guest post was written by Antonio Baduy Cámara, a “pro-vaxxer” who resides in Mexico. This is his first post here, so give him a hearty welcome in the comments.
Try it ...again!!!!!!!!!!!