CBD oil research
Tweezers hold cannabis bud in a laboratory

The phyto-chemical, Cannabidiol is extracted from the flowers and buds of marijuana or industrial hemp plants. It does not produce intoxication; marijuana’s “high effects” are mostly caused by the phyto-chemical tetrahydrocannabinol (THC). Inhalation of water vapor has a higher bioavailability than other methods of consumption. When vaporized, CBD oil enters directly into the bloodstream through the lungs and is not processed or destroyed anywhere else in the human body. This allows for a very high percentage of CBD oil for vaping to be absorbed into the bloodstream. Additionally, since the CBD enters directly into the bloodstream, vaping CBD is very fast-acting method.

How Cannabinoid Is Effective for Preventing Strokes

According to a recent study conducted by the U.S. National Institute of Health, the endocannabinoid N-arachidonoylethanolamine, which is commonly referred to as anandamide, happens to play an integral role in supplementing the processes in neurometabolic and cerebrovascular diseases. Moreover, cannabidiol (CBD), which is a non-psychoactive element of the plant Cannabis Sativa, is an effective and reliable therapeutic candidate for both promoting endocannabinoid signaling and for acting at numerous pharmacological targets. That makes CBD oil highly effective for preventing strokes.

CBD Oil Therapy for Strokes

CBD oil has been under investigation for quite some time now. Researchers and scientists have tried to investigate the ability of CBD oil to treat neurodegenerative diseases, like Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases. As a result of this recent research, quite a few neurogenerative properties of cannabinoid have surfaced that show it can promote the repair and generation of brain cells. The CBD oil therapy is a promising treatment that can treat strokes immediately after the onset of symptoms.

Normally, an important factor in stroke recovery treatment is timeliness. Today, there are two options to treat a stroke. Both the methods are implemented immediately after the diagnosis. The first method is tissue plasminogen indicator, which is used for ischemic strokes and endovascular surgery. Such a surgery is used to treat hemorrhagic strokes. Both these treatments need to be applied within three to six hours after experiencing the stroke.

When it comes to CBD oil therapy, timeliness is an equally important element in it as well. As it turns out, CBD oil is known for its ability to increase the blood circulation, which means it can restore oxygen and other important nutrients in the brain areas that are affected because of the stroke. CBD oil therapy is more effectual for ischemic strokes because it can restore blood flow and dissolve the blood clot that has caused the stroke, but the therapy cannot correct the artery that has been damaged during a hemorrhagic stroke.

The Advantages of CBD Oil Therapy

The research by the U.S. National Institute of Health proves that CBD oil therapy can improve the motor skills and cognitive ability that are impaired after suffering a stroke. But for this, the therapy must commence immediately after the stroke. Besides that, CBD oil formula also protects other areas of the brain and reduces the effects of the stroke. But the results of CBD therapy depend on when it is administered because like other options to treat stroke, time is of the essence in CBD therapy as well.


Massive vaccine Cover-Up
New evidence shows that members of a global vaccine committee may have been involved in a massive cover-up regarding the safety of the HPV vaccine. State-based action alerts!
Earlier this month, Cornell-trained clinical pathologist Sin Hang Lee, MD, sent an open letter to the director general of the World Health Organization, Dr. Margaret Chan, alleging that members of the Global Advisory Committee on Vaccine Safety (GACVS) are guilty of gross misconduct and criminal malfeasance in their efforts to mislead the global public on the safety of the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine.
The controversy revolves around Dr. Lee’s study finding that Gardasil (Merck’s HPV vaccine) contains HPV L1 gene DNA fragments. In a separate case study, Dr. Lee found HPV-16 L1 DNA fragments in post-mortem blood samples of a teenager who died six months after receiving three Gardasil injections. Dr. Lee hypothesizes that the HPV L1 gene DNA fragments bind to aluminum adjuvants in the vaccine and are carried through the blood stream by macrophages to the brain, causing the adverse effects many experience after receiving HPV shots. Based on this evidence, Dr. Lee called for further study of the HPV vaccines.
One would think the scientific community would take heed—especially scientists on the GACVS, who are responsible for advising the world on vaccine safety. Aluminum in vaccines is a serious issue that we’ve addressed at length in previous coverage. There are studies that have linked aluminum to all kinds of negative health effects ranging from autism to Alzheimer’s disease. Other researchers have noted that, despite eighty years of use, the safety of aluminum adjuvants rests largely on assumptions rather than experimental evidence.
Read more:

As a medical doctor and scientist, I write to present grave concerns regarding the conduct of certain members of the Global Advisory Committee on Vaccine Safety (GACVS), the World Health

Organization, the CDC and other scientific/health professionals during the time shortly before the public hearing on HPV Vaccine Safety which was held in Tokyo, Japan on February 26, 2014. I have come into possession of documentation which leads me to believe multiple individuals and organizations deliberately set out to mislead Japanese authorities regarding the safety of the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines, Gardasil® and Cervarix®, which were being promoted at that time.

I am sure you are well aware of the controversy currently surrounding these vaccines on a global level.I am also sure you are aware of the fact that public confidence in national and  international health authorities is at an all time low throughout the world.

Should the information in this letter prove to be accurate, nothing short of an immediate independent investigation resulting in appropriate disciplinary actions for those involved will be able to restore the public trust. Therefore, I implore you to act quickly and decisively regarding this critical public health issue.

Are Bill and Melinda Gates Guilty of Committing Fraud in India?

The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation connected to the HPV vaccine and its trials in India? The connection is that is that in 2002, The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) acquired shares in Merck and the charge is that the BMGF along with an organisation called GAVI (a vaccine alliance funded by BMGF) are pushing a vaccine agenda in India and other places in the world in collusion with health authorities who are recommending the use of vaccines without proper testing; actions amounting to vaccine fraud.It has long been an ugly truth that Indian lives are cheaper compared with their western counterparts. Poorer sections of Indian communities are routinely used as human guinea pigs, subject to testing by pharmaceutical companies1 – testing that could be illegal or expensive or impossible in western nations; testing that is most often done without informed consent and at times by employing coercion, concealment and other underhand tactics.
One in a line of questionable activities by international pharmaceutical companies in India refers to the HPV vaccine made by American company Merck, which happens to be one of the largest pharmaceutical companies in the world. The United States government earns royalty on the sale of Merck’s vaccine and cbd oil and there is a strong perception that any negative news report against this vaccine is not only discouraged but actively squashed. In the US, well known news broadcaster Katie Couric was made to apologise for her interview with a mother whose daughter died after receiving the Gardasil vaccine. Later the assistant Surgeon General appeared on her show to assure everyone the vaccine was safe.
The actions of the pharma company promoting their vaccine ruthlessly in India have been termed as ‘fraud’ and a PIL against Merck including its part owner the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is currently pending in Supreme Court of India.
The HPV vaccine Gardasil, manufactured by Merck has been widely administered to about 16,000 girls in a Telengana district in 2009. Many of these girls fell ill and 5 died. More deaths associated with the HPV vaccine were also reported from Gujarat, when Cervarix, manufactured by GSK was administered. A significant proportion of consent forms for conducting studies were found to have only thumb impressions, while even more were found to be signed by hostel wardens where the girls stayed or by often illiterate guardians.
Negative reactions to the vaccine have been reported from Colombia as well. There are several lawsuits pending in Spain and France with regard to the vaccine. According to former doctor of Merck’s, the HPV vaccine could be “the greatest medical scandal of all time.” While Japan has halted the vaccine to begin inquiry into safety issues concerning the vaccine, Israel is also considering cancellation of the vaccine due to side effects.







Due to the popularity of CBD , Dogs and cats are increasingly taking the non-THC cannabis compound as their owners seek to provide much needed relief to their four-legged friends for symptoms of everything from anxiety to pain and epileptic seizures. While there’s large amounts of data proving CBD oil for dogs works for many of these ailments, some people are swearing by it and more vets in america are prescribing it.

“I don’t think people should think of this as a panacea and start giving CBD to their pets for every ailment,” said Dr. Francisco DiPolo, a veterinarian at Worth Street Veterinary Center in New York City, who prescribes it for some of his patients. “I think it’s powerful and we need to learn more about it.”

Oxycodone Detox Center

Research included a patient who had abruptly ceased injecting heroin to stop abuse and self-managed opioid withdrawal and chronic pain using kratom. After co-administering the herb with maltodextrin he experienced a multi virtual seizure, but he reported only modest abstinence once kratom administration stopped. Researchers confirmed the identity of the plant matter he ingested as kratom and identified no contaminant substance or adulterants. The study showed no conclusion of high-throughput molecular screening and the binding affinity at mu, delta and kappa receptors of mitragynine.

The university reported the self-treatment of chronic pain and opioid withdrawal with kratom. The predominantly accepted dosage of kratom capsules,  containing mitragynine, binds mu- and kappa-opioid receptors, but has additional receptor modules that might augment its effectiveness at mitigating opiate withdrawal. The natural geographical history of kratom use, including its clinical pharmacology and toxicology, are increasingly understood.

Sales of the nation’s two most popular prescription painkillers have exploded in new parts of the country, an Associated Press analysis shows, worrying experts who say the push to relieve patients’ suffering is spawning an addiction epidemic.

In 2015, more people died of a drug overdose than in any other year on record, and most of these overdose related  deaths involved an prescription pain killers. Opioid-related deaths have quadrupled from 1998 to 2013, with an apparent disconnect between pain and the prescription of oxycodone: During this time period, the amount of oxycontin prescribed nearly quadrupled; however, hospital patients’ overall pain ratings remained the same. Given the abundance of prescription opioids being written by doctors- causing abuse problems, national protests and attention has overwhelmingly focused on the appropriate prescribing of oxycontin, as well as patient and prescriber education. The DEA recently established guidelines for prescribing opioids for chronic pain, and all healthcare nurse practitioners should be familiar with these guidelines in order to avoid inadvertently fostering abuse.

Among acute opioid-abuse issues, heroin overdose is readily discussed; however, the problem of acute withdrawal symptoms associated with opioid-detoxification syndrome, especially in the acute-care treatment setting, deserves equal attention. Treatment of oxycontin withdrawal depends on the healthcare setting, the type(s) of substances abused, and individual patient characteristics.

Medical professionals have long been on high alert about powerful painkillers like OxyContin because of their widespread abuse by teenagers and others for recreational purposes. These opioid medications require a patient to attend residential oxycontin detox programs.


Baby M’s Parents,

Secretary of Health and Human Services,
Preliminary Neurobehavioral/Forensics Report: Baby M, a minor.

Dr Andrew Moulden BA, MA, MD, PhD April 30, 2009
Vaccine Injury Coalition
4371 Northlake Blvd., #337
Palm Beach Gardens, FL USA 33410

To whom it may concern:

Please note that I have reviewed the medical records, forensics, clinical case history, histopathology (having attended at the Orange County Coroner’s Office and the Regional Encephalitis Project in Richmond, California – where post mortem brain tissue is currently housed), and interviewed the family with respect to the death of Baby M.

Baby M was a healthy child. At 15 months of age, this child received an MMR vaccination administered at Harbor Pediatrics, Orange County, California, as part of the standard well baby examination/follow-up.

Within hours of vaccination this child began exhibiting symptoms and signs consistent with an adverse reaction to vaccination. He became withdrawn, listless, bradyphrenic, and bradykinetic. He exhibited increased sensitivity to noxious stimuli. He exhibited a progressive decrease in spontaneous vocalizations. He developed difficulties moving his arms and legs. He had testicular swelling. His facial expression and animation became flat. Subtle ischemic bulbar palsies emerged. He experienced emesis 2 days post vaccination. His condition continued to deteriorate, neurobehaviorally, despite the families repeat visits to medical professionals seeking answers to Baby M’s emerging clinical symptoms and signs. Ultimately, the deterioration progressed to seizures, apnea, intubation (respiratory failure in hospital), and brain death. This was a progressive decline in function over a 19 day period.

Page 2
Pre-post MMR vaccination analyses of Baby M’s neurobehavioral status and functioning reveal the emergence of ischemic brain damages temporally locked to the administration of the vaccination. The temporal sequence, cause-effect, medical model, statistical significance, histopathology, and reproducibility of these damages, from individual to individual, is now established and demonstrable for the vaccine injury court Special Masters. The pathological sequence, as in Baby M’s case, can emerge within hours and days of vaccination. The vaccination causes/has caused impaired blood flow (ischemia), diffusely, largely at watershed, end vascular microcirculation territories. This creates hard, measurable, neurobehavioral signs/features that can be measured and extracted, forensically, in a pre-post vaccination analysis on a case-by-case basis. Through differential diagnostic means, all other potential causes of these ischemic neurobehavioral damages were ruled out. We have now demonstrated that these same damages emerge in a multitude of vaccine recipients, including cases that the vaccine injury courts have already concluded “were it not for the vaccination, permanent brain damages would not have emerged.

In the case of Baby M, the following notes are relevant:

He was neurobehaviorally intact at the time of vaccination. He developed progressive neurobehavioral deterioration beginning within 4 hours of

He exhibited hard, quantifiable neurobehavioral deficits, within hours and days of vaccination that, through differential diagnostic means, can only be accounted for by ischemia (impaired blood flow), hypoxia (low oxygen) and anoxia (no oxygen) delivery/utilization diffusely within the brain and brainstem. These facts are corroborated by the brain biopsy post-mortem report. A cerebral perfusion scan in hospital (while the patient was intubated) revealed no blood flow/perfusion to the brain, despite normal heart rate, blood pressure, and oxygen saturation (PaO2). This highlights the fact that the impaired blood flow through the brain, from vaccination adversity, is largely a clinically silent phenomena, even while infants/children/teens/adults are in an Intensive Care Unit undergoing acute, life terminating decompensation, and progressive
impairment to brain function and integrity.

Baby M exhibits the same, quantifiable, measurable, hard neurobehavioral signs of ischemic brain damage (microvascular bulbar palsies) that all other vaccine injured subjects’ do. This is temporally locked to vaccination, with real time, prospective and retrospective analyses, for Baby M, and thousands of others who have succumbed to the same, here-to-fore, clinically silent pathophysiological sequence.

The vaccine induced ischemic/hypoxic process can kill (respiratory and cardiac failure), maim (subtle neurocognitive damages from ischemia), and cause brain/organ damages in clinically apparent to silent ways. The entire range of neurodevelopmental disorders can emerge as a function of the degree, duration, breadth, magnitude, and geographic location, within the
circulatory system and brain that these occlusive microvascular processes emerge. Medical and post-mortem analyses could find no pathological, pathogenic, or genetic susceptibility to account for the sudden deterioration in function culminating in respiratory failure, seizures, comatose state, progressive bulbar palsies, brainstem compromise, and
ultimately death.

Post mortem tissue analyses revealed “diffuse hypoxia” throughout the brain along with perivascular mononucleated inflammatory cells. These findings are not uncommon after measles encephalitic and other childhood infectious diseases that culminate in death and encephalopathy. This is one of the hallmarks of the non-specific immune hyper stimulation and colloidal instability of blood flow, affecting microcirculation units within the body and brain. No specific pathogenic trigger was delineated. The reason no pathogen was isolated is because it is not a pathogen that causes death and morbidity; it is a process, that causes impaired blood flow, largely within microcirculation units. This process is validated in the scientific and medical literature. Western medicine simply has not deciphered how this process is unfolding, in physiology. We have now resolved this medical mystery as well.

Cause of death for Baby M was from vaccine induced hypoxia/ischemia from a non-specific immune hyper stimulation (neutrophil/white blood cell), and loss of colloidal stability of blood flow. This process created the clinical, forensic, neurobehavioral, neuroimaging, neropathological, and histopathological features that have been medically charted and
corroborated in the medical records and clinical history. This process is also the cause of vaccine induced sudden infant death, autism-spectrum, and a host of other adverse outcomes from vaccination (virulent infectious diseases and heavy metals/toxins) sequestered in smooth muscle linings of the microcirculation units or deposited within varied tissue beds.

The hypoxia/ischemia emerged as a function of progressive occlusion of microcirculation units in the brain (and body). This vaccination induced process caused the neurobehavioral deterioration, cranial nerve palsies, seizures, respiratory failure, comatose state, and ultimately progressive paralysis of the central drive for respiration at the brainstem levels which control the apneustic/pneumotaxic brainstem regions responsible for automatic respiration. The apneustic/pneumotaxic brainstem regions is in a watershed vascular territory. If blood follow is impaired, there are no other vascular branches to “pick up the slack.” Hypoxic brain injury will emerge and functions will be lost.

Multiple brain (and body) regions are in end vascular, watershed circulation territories. This includes, but is not limited to, several brainstem neuronal groups , the descending sub-cortical sensori-motor tracts (e.g. corticobulbar tracts, posterior limb of the internal capsule, periventricular aqueductal gray mater..), the anterior horn cells of the spinal cord, interhemispheric commisures, and several brainstem cranial nerves tracts and nuclear groups. These areas are all uniquely susceptible to diffuse processes that impair forward progression of blood flow (create hypoxia/ischemia) since these neuronal regions are all in watershed, end vascular territories (see Tolerance Lost DVD Vol. 1-3 – attached to this submission). Pathology can emerge from trauma (e.g. cerebral palsy and Mobius syndrome from prenatal hypoxia), or from post-natal events that impair blood flow (oxygenation) directly, at the end vascular networks (vaccinations/virulent infectious diseases/heavy metals).

When the ischemic/hypoxic process simultaneously impairs blood flow to bilateral brainstem respiratory controls, then apnea (labored breathing with “pauses”) to cessation of breathing will occur (i.e. Sudden Infant Death Syndrome). This respiratory paralysis is the same mechanism by which polio (infantile paralysis) caused respiratory failure (“iron lung”) and vaccinations can sometimes cause Guillain Barre syndrome – a progressive, ascending paralysis, with respiratory drive failure, from infectious disease and/or post vaccination.

The ascending paralysis is actually the spread of the hypoxic penumbra, across descending motor tracts affecting the lower limbs and diaphragm, within the central nervous system. These are strokes – in evolution – triggered by immune hyper-stimulation. Life sustaining motor controls are impaired, if the ischemic/hypoxic process extends to the level of the descending motor controls for the diaphragm (the muscle that inflates the lungs). The ischemia/hypoxia process silently unfolds at the level of brain and brainstem centers and not just the spinal cord motor units or neuromuscular junction. These conclusions are now empirical based on the motoric deficits, reflecting central nervous system damages (within the brain) that we can now see, and measure.

The hypoxic state will de-stabilize neuronal electrical stability and seizures can emerge. The seizures are a symptom (like a cough is to a cold) of the ischemic/hypoxic process, and not the cause of permanent brain damage in and of itself. If the latter were true, then electroconvulsive shock therapy, for intransient psychiatric disorders, would be causing death and permanent brain damages – which it clearly does not.

Once the brainstem controls to the reticular activating system are impaired, by the ischemic/hypoxic process, then the level of alertness/awareness will deteriorate into a disoriented to stuporous to comatose state. In the case of Baby M, this decline in level of consciousness evolved coincident with the emergence of hard, measurable brainstem signs of neurobehavioral compromise (e.g. cranial nerve palsies, dolls eye phenomena, positive cold

calorics testing). These features progressively emerged, post vaccination. These features are all detailed in the clinical notes from the I.C.U. attending physicians during the ischemic death sequence which began within several hours of vaccination.

The ischemic state will impair oxygenation at the end vascular watershed microcirculation units thereby creating highly specific cranial nerve palsies which can be measured in a pre-post vaccination with a within subjects design. Baby M exhibits these clinical signs of brainstem ischemia and “infarction.” The ischemic process is equivalent to “strangulating” multiple, diffuse, end microvessel areas, as the blood vessels are serially, and progressively occluded. The faster the response, the less evidence there will be of the ischemic cause of death in post-mortem analyses. Post mortem, at best, utilizing contemporary histopathological techniques at 300 x magnifications and hematoxylin and Eosin staining, as was used in the case of Baby M, is like looking for “fingerprints” on a plate glass window with the naked eye – it is unresolveable.

The cause of death for Baby M, during life, was impaired to no blood flow throughout the brain.

This “process” of “no blood flow” is also present at death – for everyone. Therefore, coroner’s cannot find cause of death in post-mortem analyses as the cause of death, and disability, from vaccination, is a process, rather than a pathological entity. This process is present in death (no blood flow) as much as it is/was to cause death during life. The “footprints” of this ischemic process, however, are present in the post-mortem analysis, as it was for Baby M. These“footprints” can also be brough to life with new histopathological techniques – specific for the “M.A.S.S. ischemic process” triggered by vaccination.

Utilizing differential diagnostic methods, there remains no other account for the highly specific cranial nerve palsies (paralyses) and neurobehavioral decompensation and signs in the case of Baby M. This was the “MASS” hypoxia/ischemia cascade from colloidal instability and immune hyper stimulation. In the case of Baby M, this can best be construed as a vaccine induced vasculopathy. Vasculopathy is the number one cause of isolated cranial nerve palsies. When these palsies are multiple, and bilateral, reflecting upper and lower motor neuron compromise,then the conclusion emerges from this pattern that the process leading to pathology is diffuse and systemic. With concurrent structural and functional brain imaging, as was obtained for Baby M, correlated with clinical evaluation, it also becomes apparent that this ischemic/hypoxic
process has largely remained clinically silent – until now.

We have enhanced the existing neurobehavioral clinical skills and measures that physicians routinely use to assess the integrity of the central nervous system.

The vasculopathic process created by vaccines (all vaccines) can now be live imaged, in realtime, and retrospectively, for all vaccine recipients using standard, accepted, core, medical and anatomically based clinical skills and measures. Applying these enhancements to individuals in a pre-post vaccination within subjects design/analysis, we have established proof causation for

vaccine induced morbidity that has been before our eyes all along – yet unappreciated by the medical establishment. This is unequivocal brain damage, for all, irrespective of the end diagnoses that emerges.

The neurobehavioral damages induced in Baby M are ischemic/hypoxic and common to many vaccine injured individuals spanning a broad range of clinical diagnostic categories from: Sudden infant death, autism-spectrum, pervasive developmental disabilities, specific learning disabilities, attention-deficit disorders, Gardasil adversity, cases of “gulf war syndrome” and
dementia, global developmental delay, aphasia, some cases of cerebral palsy, “Moyamoya”, “Kawasaki’ syndrome” and more.

The ischemic/hypoxic damages are additive, summative, and cumulative, acute and chronic, waxing and waning, and sometimes transient and singular events from which the person fully recovers. Although virulent infectious diseases can also cause the same pathophysiological cascade (e.g. Polio virus), it is the locking of the ischemic/hypoxic temporal sequence, to vaccination, that establishes causation in specific cases, coincident with medical records, differential diagnostic acumen, and pre-post vaccination neurobehavioral assessments. We have now established, under certain immunological tolerance conditions, that direct vaccination is not even required in order for an infant/child to sustain ischemic/hypoxic vaccine injuries. Direct vaccination of the mother, followed by breast feeding, can also induce the same pathophysiological sequence, leading to sudden death and autism-spectrum, as direct vaccination to the individual can.

We have cross validated the neurobehavioral measures of Baby M’s symptoms and signs of vaccine induced brain damages with that of other cases the vaccine injury courts Special Masters have already concluded “were it not for the administration of the vaccine, the brain damages/seizures etc.. would not have occurred”.

Seizures are a symptom of the ischemic/hypoxic process. Seizures are to vaccination induced brain damage as a cough is to a cold. The seizure(s) are a symptom of the pathophysiological process and not the cause of the pathological condition in and of itself.

Baby M’s wrongful death, from ischemic brain damages, was precipitated/caused by the vaccinations he received at Harbour Pedatrics.

The vasculopathic process created by the vaccination is no different from the vasculopathic process triggered by wild polio virus that causes paralysis, respiratory failure (“iron lung”), death, Guillain barre syndrome, and ischemic brain damages that range from clinically insignificant to life terminating. A similar vasculopathic process emerges with congenital rubella syndrome, measles encephalitis, acute disseminating encephalomyelitis, infantile paralysis,

“encephalopathy –not otherwise specified”, Moyamoya, Kawasaki’s syndrome, and a host of clinical labels we have assigned to varied clinical conditions for which we have here-to-fore not determined the underlying cause of morbidity. As physicians, however, we do sometimes
recognize that a vasculopathic process is at work.

I have included with this brief case summary letter a copy of the DVD series “Tolerance Lost” Volumes 1-3. The DVD series outlines multiple vaccine injury cases, spanning all vaccinations, wherein this vasculopathic ischemic/hypoxic process (which we have called “M.A.S.S.”) has
emerged. The causal explanation (and forensics) for the case of Baby M, is reported towards the end of Volume 2 and Volume 3 of the Tolerance Lost Disk set. The mechanism of injury is detailed along with other similar vaccine injury cases.

I will compile a complete forensic expert report, with full references and differential diagnostic case review, for the case of Baby M, relative to the acquired brain injuries he sustained inn conjunction with vaccination. Neurobehavioral assessments of acquired brain and behavioral disorders is my area of expertise.

Background Training of clinical case report expert:

My area of expertise is in neurobehavioral assessment of brain and behavioral disorders. My Bachelor’s degree was in biological psychology. I graduated valedictorian with an 88% cumulative average in my core area of specialty –Laurentian University). My Masters degree was in Child Development with thesis in language and neurocognitive development in children and adolescents (Laurentian University). My undergraduate course grades in brain and behavior (98%) and neurobiology (94%) were straight “A’s”. I achieved a similar level of academic success during the Masters and PhD degrees.

My PhD was in clinical-experimental neuropsychology. I completed a sub-specialization in cognitive neuroscience during the PhD degree (University of Ottawa). My PhD comprehensive exams were on acquired brain injuries and post concussion syndrome. I worked with the mild brain injury association as a group leader with the head injury association of Toronto during the PhD training.

I was a Natural, Sciences, Engineering, and Research Council of Canada Scholar, an Ontario Mental Health Foundation scholar, an Ontario Graduate Scholar, and received Awards for research, clinical, and teaching excellence from the University o Toronto and the University of Ottawa during my graduate training.

My clinical training during the PhD was in clinical neuropsychology (Baycrest Hospital, Rotman Research Institute – University of Toronto, Credit Valley Hospital, Ottawa Health Sciences

Center memory Disorders Clinic). The PhD thesis was in functional brain imaging and neuroelectrophysiology (Univ. of Toronto). I subsequently completed a medical degree at McMaster University in Hamilton, Ontario.

During the PhD my extra-curricular training was in behavioral neurology and clinical neuropsychology. My clerkship electives training during medical school was in clinical neurology. My residency training was in psychiatry/neuropsychiatry. I received the licentiate of the Medical Counsel of Canada having passed the core knowledge (LMCC 1) and clinical skills
(LMCC 2) exams consistent with the United States Medical Licensing Exams (USMLE parts 1 and 2).

During my clinical residency training I have been ranked in the top 1-5% of medical residents during rotations by my supervisors including my emergency medicine rotations in Ottawa. I have elected to devote myself to neurobehavioral and neurocognitive assessments and research based upon my PhD and Masters training rather than practicing clinical medicine. I pursued the Medical degree solely to further understand brain and behavioral disorders, from a clinical medicine frame of reference, rather than pursuing a goal to become a practicing/prescribing physician.

I have taught university level courses on Brain and Behavior, neurodiagnostic assessments, neuropsychiatry and behavioral neurology/neurobiology, since entering graduate school at the PhD level in 1992. For the past several years I have devoted myself to deciphering the neurobehavioral sequelae associated with immune system hyper stimulation, neurodevelopmental disorders, and ultimately to vaccinations as the common environmental trigger for several brain and behavioral disorders I have studied since the undergraduate degree.

My work will be submitted for peer review in the upcoming several months. For now, peer review is available in the Tolerance Lost DVD series as I have translated the medical sciences into information and presentation style that can be understood by the public at large, as well as the vaccine injury court special masters. Some of the evidence of harm is now in a “see for yourself” format.

Live Imaging:
Please note that we are perfecting live imaging technologies to see this ischemic process, noninvasively, after vaccination –all vaccinations, in medical clinics/and or courts of law. Our ability to start helping/healing and preventing disease and morbidity is conditional upon the medical-legal system admitting there is a problem. It is of no use that we have invented a “bandaid” when the medical-legal system refuses to admit we are “bleeding.” We are hemorrhaging, as a society. We have solutions. We have answers, even for those that have been harmed.

However, helping us all requires our establishing, for all, that this problem with vaccination is real, is now understood, and that the path to pathology meets the federal Circuit Courts criteria of:
1) 50% and a feather
2) Temporal sequence
3) Causation
4) Medical model.

We believe we have now answered the Courts 4 criteria above. The case of Baby M is now the means by which we can establish proof causation for all. Our medical errors have been due to lack of understanding of colloidal stability and immune hyper stimulation, and an under appreciation of what to measure to assert clinical safety or adversity. All the forensic evidence we have to bring to bear, in this one case, is peer reviewed, published, and accepted fact, within the scientific literature. Unfortunately, the knowledge spans across several disciplines, some of which medical doctors have had no training in (e.g. colloidal chemistry and fluid dynamics). This has contributed to our misunderstanding. We can rectify this misunderstanding and return to the dictate of “doing more good than harm.”

Range of Pathological outcome:
There are several factors that determine the breadth, range, and severity of adversity to vaccination, across different individuals, at different times. Do note that the infectious diseases, and heavy metals, in and of themselves, under the right conditions, can induce the same pathological ischemic/hypoxic state that has caused Baby M’s death. The medical literature has referred to this in varied forms, including the “Sanarelli/Schwartzman”, “Bordet”, “blood sludging”, and thrombo-hemmorhagic” phenomena. Baby M’s case, however, based on differential diagnostic means, and temporal sequences to clinical adversity, was clearly caused by vaccination, and not some other extraneous trigger.

Germ Theory:
It is not the “germs” that are causing the pathological ischemic/hypoxic state. It is a non-specific immune response to immune hyper stimulation that impairs blood flow, colloidal stability, tissue oxygenation, and can create a diffuse, or circumscribed, hypoxic-ischemic process capable of inducing a range of human disorder and disease from clinically insignificant to life terminating. It is the immune and hematological response to “foreign things” entering the body, that is causing ischemic pathology. This cannot be antibody mediated since the adversity and ischemic damages emerge to soon after vaccination for the cause to be found primarily in an antibody

response (which takes several days rather than several hours). This is the realm of the nonspecific immune response precipitating disease, hypoxia, and ischemia.

In the case of Baby M, cause of death was caused by what we have dubbed “M.A.S.S.” (Moulden Anoxia Spectra Syndromes) vasculopathic process which progressively impaired blood flow throughout the body, and brain, ultimately shutting down central brainstem drives for respiration and causing irreversible hypoxic/ischemic brain damage – the cause of death.
When all vaccinations cause the same ischemic, quantifiable, neurobehavioral damages, irrespective of what “disease and clinical label” comes out, across the lifespan, it becomes self evident that it is not the “germs” that are causing disease and disability. It is something generic that the body is doing in response to immunological challenges that is causing morbidity. We have discovered what this “something” is, in medical physiology and colloidal chemistry. This “something” is also the means by which wild polio virus causes paralysis, respiratory failure, and
deterioration of muscle and bones.

Baby M – Forensic reports

It is possible that Baby M was immunological intolerant to the vaccination, or vaccine products, received. It is not possible to determine which specific component of the vaccination caused the vasculopathic/ischemic-hypoxic state. The conclusion is clear, however, that were it not for the administration of the vaccination, the neurobehavioral damages would not have emerged to the brain of Baby M, and he would not have lost his life.

The pre and post-mortem neuroimaging and neuropathology reports capture the vaccine induced ischemic/hypoxic process with the following summations:

Exhibit 1:
Saint Josephs Hospital: Cerebral Blood Flow Imaging – pre-death:
Baby M: – Radiology report from Dr. Hieu T. Truong, M.D.
Radiology and Nuclear Imaging Brain W/Flow Imaging:
St. Joseph Hospital, Orange County, California.
Radiology/Imaging Report No. [withheld]
page 1 of 2: Service Date: [withheld]

Technique: 6.8 mCi tc 99m pertechnetate was injected and dynamic anterior images were acquired at 2 seconds per frame for 30 frames. 10 minute delayed anterior static images were
also acquired.

Findings: Dynamic images during the first minute show blood flow to the pharyngeal tissues and to the scalp. There is no significant perfusion to the brain. Delayed images show increased flow to the scalp and the pharyngeal tissues. Again, there is no significant uptake within the cerebral hemispheres.

Impression: Lack of flow to the cerebral hemispheres, consistent with brain death. Recommend correlation with clinical findings as well as EEG.
Hieu T. Trong, M.D. [date]

Exhbit 2:

Post-Mortem Brain Biopsy –Pathology Report -excerpts

Orange County Sheriff Coroner
Microscopic Neuropathology

Report No: 07-00985-OS pages 1-2;

Dr John M. Andrews, M.D., Forensic Neuropathologist
“Although not well developed, there is evidence of incipient, acute, Hypoxic/Ischemic neuronal injury in patchy distribution in all (brain) sections. Edema and mild autolysis are also seen in patchy distribution.

“There is mild pervivascular infiltration of mononucleated chronic inflammatory cells around rare intraparenchymal vessels.”

“The perivascular infiltrates are very sparse, and do not suggest any specific inflammatory disorder. Rather, they raise question of some reactive change to a systemic toxic (including inflammatory) or metabolic process. Possible areas of further investigation could include obtaining results of any ante-mortem clinical studies that were still pending at the time of

John M. Andrews, M.D., Forensic Neuropathologist
California regional Encephalitis Project – Richmond, California

The brain tissue for Baby M was further subjugated to specialized staining procedures and infectious disease analyses across a host of pathogens and antibodies. Bodian and Weil neuronal staining procedures and Polymerase chain reaction virological analyses were performed on the brain tissue of Child martin. No pathogenic virus or bacterial species could be
identified to account for the cause of death.

Clinical-pathological correlation and follow-up

As per the post-mortem brain autopsy recommendations of the Orange County Forensic Neuropathologist above (Dr. John M Andrews), I further investigated the ante-mortem clinical records and pre-post vaccine neurobehavioral exam. It became clear that Child Martin began exhibiting the clinical signs of ischemic brain damage within days of the vaccination and that these damages progressed in a manner identical to similar cases in which the Federal Vaccine Injury Court Special Masters have ruled that severe and permanent brain damage would not have emerged (within days) “but for the administration of the MMR vaccination” (re: Erin Zeller and Benjamin S. Zeller, Parents of Benjamin J. Zeller, a minor vs. Secretary of Health and
Human Services 06-0120V – filed July 30, 2008).

Benjamin Zeller and Baby M

The vaccine injury cases of Benjamin Zeller and that of Baby M are virtually identical, save for the terminal outcome for Baby M, and the permanent brain damages sustained by Benjamin

Had heroic medical interventions saved the life of Baby M, then he would be alive today in a similar state of permanent brain damages as Benjamin Zeller. Both cases succumbed to hypoxic/ischemic injuries, causing permanent brain damages, seizures, respiratory failure, quantifiable cranial nerve ischemic palsies (paralysis). This was all caused by the M.A.S.S. vasculopathic process from vaccination. This is called “hypoxic-ischemic disease” in the medical literature. In these cases, the process was likely triggered by colloidal instability of blood flow and non-specific immune hyper stimulation from the MMR/vaccination.

Corroborating Case Analyses

I have now assessed several hundred vaccine injury cases (and healthy controls), similar to Baby M’s case. I am now in a position to offer the following definitive, empirical, replicable, statistically significant conclusions based upon a within subjects pre-post vaccination design, as
well as a between subjects design (comparing vaccine adversity with no vaccine adversity). “Baby M’s cause of death was from an ischemia/hypoxia vasculopathic process that would not have emerged but for the administration of the MMR vaccination.”

I can now demonstrate the adverse effects, in court, for the Special Masters to observe and see for themselves, with their own eyes. The evidence was before us all along. It is now appreciable for us all to see – ischemic brain damages from vaccinations…all vaccinations, across all age

The ischemic damages are not always static. The process can be waxing and waning for several months to years post vaccination. The adverse effects, at the microcirculation units are also additive and summative with each repeat vaccination – for some. This is no longer clinically
silent. The brain is not the only organ system that is adversely affected. Unborn fetuses can also be adversely affected, several months after maternal repeat vaccination series.

Baby M & Benjamin Zeller vs. HHSC and Autism

The pathological process caused from vaccination is as much the cause of death for Baby M as it is the cause of permanent brain injury for Benjamin Zeller as it is the cause of autism for Michelle Cedillo (the Feb. 2009 Omnibus hearings test case of vaccine induced autism) and celebrity children like Evan McCarthy – son of Jenny McCarthy and Jet Travolta (son of John Travolta). All subjects exhibit the exact same neurobehavioral, measurable, quantifiable ischemic sequelae from vaccination. These sequelae are only caused by ischemic brain damages once the differential diagnostic approach rules out other causes of the neurobehavioral measures and clinical signs which emerged shortly after vaccination.

This “M.A.S.S.” ischemia/hypoxic state is the active process by which other cases before the vaccine injury courts have led the Special Masters to conclude: “were it not for vaccination, the permanent brain injury would not have occurred.” This ischemia process is also the cause of
vaccine induced Guillain Barre syndrome, seizures, encephalopathy, and other pathologic morbid states. The clinical labels, as it turns out, are collections of symptoms invariably reflecting the same common mechanism of injury, in the human body, that culminates in disease, death, clinical labels, and disorder states.

Regrettably, the pathophysiological process that has caused Baby M’s death is also the same process that caused infantile paralysis and respiratory failure from Polio (“iron lung”), cerebrovascular hypoxic/ischemic vascular lesions with congenital rubella, death from measles encephalopathy, the plethora of neurodevelopmental disabilities, cases of retinal and
intracerebral hemorrhages, temporary brittle bone disease, we now, as we can directly see and measure, it is also the cause of sudden infant death syndrome and autism-spectrum, post vaccination. The vaccine damages also extend to dementia, although I have not empirically
validated these latter preliminary findings.

All of the conclusions outlined are now based in empirical science, direct observation, in the here and now, retrospectively, and prospectively for those that have died, or not died, from the M.A.S.S. ischemic/hypoxic process.

Corroborating Analyses:

Please note that we have also evaluated the recent (Feb. 2009) Omnibus hearings test case of Michelle Cedillo (autism) and the case of Hannah Poling (MMR-autism) based on a cross-case forensic evaluation of pre and post vaccination ischemia neurobehavioral measures, assessment, and evaluation. We have found that these individuals have also succumbed to the “M.A.S.S.” ischemia process – triggered by vaccination.

Truth wears no mask, she seeks neither place nor applause, bows to no human shrine; she only asks a hearing.

The truth, in the case of Baby M, and many vaccine claimants, is that the ischemic/hypoxic process has unfolded at a level below our technology and recording instrumentation in medical and clinical sciences. We have resolved this hurdle and welcome sharing this information with the Vaccine Injury Courts, in the case of Baby M, and the medical-scientific community at large, in court, in peer reviewed publications, and concurrent with sharing this knowledge and our tools with the lay community – globally

The Tolerance Lost DVD series is the first step towards unmasking this truth, for us all. Establishing this truth, in the civil justice system, is the first step towards moving towards recovery of those that need our help, and preventing on-going damages that exceed our ability to triage and help.

Kind regards,
Dr. Andrew Moulden BA, MA, MD, PhD
April 30th, 2009



The real benefits of Kratom

Relieves pain: as mentioned above, this psychoactive agent has an activity similar to opioids, which means that people can use it for pain management. Undoubtedly, it is one of the most evident and widely known effects. 

Kratom have a fast and powerful action, can even affect the hormonal system, by increasing the amount of serotonin and dopamine released into the body. These leaves do an exceptional job, which no one can compare to any other herb or extract. 

Strengthens the immune system: studies show it can decrease the severity of diseases or prevent them completely, which makes us think it is an intelligent complement to the human diet. 

Increases energy: the metabolic effects of Kratom are one of the reasons this substance is so popular. It can achieve a rapid increase in circulation, despite its calming nature, increases the oxygen circulation in the blood, taking it to areas of the body where it needs it most. 

It calms anxiety and produces mood swings: if there is a substance capable of relieving pain and causing the effects of opium, it is logical to think that it may have an impact on the emotional state of the user. Through regulating hormones in our body, the correct Kratom dosage can help find the necessary chemical balance, without having to rely on other pharmaceutical products and adjacent side effects.

Opiate Withdrawal: Researchers have extensively studied Kratom for its relationship with opioids; not only in terms of its mechanism of action, but also in terms of the ability it has to help people get out of opium addiction. This substance provides a state of well-being similar to what people achieve with opium, but the capacity for addiction is not the same, so it can become the ideal drug to stop using opioids and pain management.

Protects the heart: scientists have also linked the use of Kratom leaves to a decrease in blood pressure. This is thanks to its action on opioid receptors. Morphine is a powerful hypotensive, and is the most recognized opioid in the world. By relieving this pressure on the cardiovascular system, these leaves can help prevent the most serious cardiovascular diseases, such as atherosclerosis, heart attacks and the possibility of the onset of cerebrovascular events. 


The truth about the measles, natural immunity, and the vaccine

Shawn Siegel – Great Mothers Questioning Vaccines

Catch as catch can

But my kids never caught anything from being vaccinated, said a mom on Dr. Tenpenny’s page.

It’s far from a matter of simply not catching anything – it’s a matter of what that means. It’s been shown that once vaccinated for whooping cough, if you’re exposed to pertussis you can carry an asymptomatic infection, display no sickness, but infect those around you for six weeks. You’ve caught the disease, but because of the vaccination can’t mount a proper immune response.

A Boston University study showed that most kids who’ve been vaccinated for measles can still develop a measles infection, with some respiratory symptoms, but without the rash. Measles is spread through respiration, so it’s possible, once again, that you could infect others. But there’s a deeper consequence, as well, aptly described by the title of the study pictured below: Measles Virus Infection Without Rash In Childhood Is Related To Disease In Adult Life. The referenced diseases are serious – degenerative diseases of the bone and cartilage, certain tumors, and others.

Another study showed a definitive association between mumps and a lowered probability of ovarian cancer.

The symptoms of disease are the immune system at work eliminating the infection – making you well. The National Institutes of Health describes fever, for instance, as working *for*, not against the person – emphasis theirs. Infectious disease is a detox process, and nothing to fear. The focus should simply be on establishing and maintaining a robust immune system, to assure the integrity of the recovery, with the added typical benefit of lifelong immunity. Once you stop to think about it, it’s perfectly natural that Nature, or God – call that force what you will – would use that process to cleanse deeply, personally, on a level science can’t even hope to achieve, to prepare you for successful adolescence and adulthood. In artificially triggering the production of antibodies, bypassing the lion’s share of the natural immune response, we’re not doing ourselves any favors – we’re setting ourselves – our kids – up for potential serious, chronic problems. When we add known neurotoxins to the mix, it morphs vaccination from simply foolish and self-defeating to insane.


In the below study, this baboon study; pertussis vaccine was shown to not prevent transmission of the pertussis pathogen, in the vaccinated; even though being challenged and remaining non symptomatic. So then, how is it possible that the claim is true that vaccination protects the unvaccinated, or those that can not be vaccinated? Obviously it does not. Why did they not do that kind of a study years ago, and as well in regard to all vaccines given? You see some of the most important issues have been overlooked; and but yet you people all present with that you are the purveyors of the needed vaccine safety and effectiveness science.

Acellular pertussis vaccines protect against disease but fail to prevent infection and transmission in a nonhuman primate model


Pertussis has reemerged as an important public health concern since current acellular pertussis vaccines (aP) replaced older whole-cell vaccines (wP). In this study, we show nonhuman primates vaccinated with aP were protected from severe symptoms but not infection and readily transmitted Bordetella pertussis to contacts. Vaccination with wP and previous infection induced a more rapid clearance compared with naïve and aP-vaccinated animals. While all groups possessed robust antibody responses, key differences in T-cell memory suggest that aP vaccination induces a suboptimal immune response that is unable to prevent infection. These data provide a plausible explanation for pertussis resurgence and suggest that attaining herd immunity will require the development of improved vaccination strategies that prevent B. pertussis colonization and transmission.

Pertussis is a highly contagious respiratory illness caused by the bacterial pathogen Bordetella pertussis. Pertussis rates in the United States have been rising and reached a 50-y high of 42,000 cases in 2012. Although pertussis resurgence is not completely understood, we hypothesize that current acellular pertussis (aP) vaccines fail to prevent colonization and transmission. To test our hypothesis, infant baboons were vaccinated at 2, 4, and 6 mo of age with aP or whole-cell pertussis (wP) vaccines and challenged with B. pertussis at 7 mo. Infection was followed by quantifying colonization in nasopharyngeal washes and monitoring leukocytosis and symptoms. Baboons vaccinated with aP were protected from severe pertussis-associated symptoms but not from colonization, did not clear the infection faster than naïve animals, and readily transmitted B. pertussis to unvaccinated contacts. Vaccination with wP induced a more rapid clearance compared with naïve and aP-vaccinated animals. By comparison, previously infected animals were not colonized upon secondary infection. Although all vaccinated and previously infected animals had robust serum antibody responses, we found key differences in T-cell immunity. Previously infected animals and wP-vaccinated animals possess strong B. pertussis-specific T helper 17 (Th17) memory and Th1 memory, whereas aP vaccination induced a Th1/Th2 response instead. The observation that aP, which induces an immune response mismatched to that induced by natural infection, fails to prevent colonization or transmission provides a plausible explanation for the resurgence of pertussis and suggests that optimal control of pertussis will require the development of improved vaccines.

Read more:


The Current Failure of Pertussis and Measles Vaccine

These below and recently new articles, and this (their) said study, amounts to nothing more than false and misleading information, and as well nothing more than a large smoke screen of deception and desperation, to keep promoting the very dangerous and becoming more and more ineffective, MMR vaccine.

Measles vaccine may protect against other diseases

Measles Vaccine Reduces Death From Other Infections Too — By Preventing ‘Immune Amnesia’

The already long existing and the real study science has already long since, shown us what the REAL truth is.

Measles jab reduces inherited immunity

A recent study found that women vaccinated with the measles vaccine pass on far less immunity to their offspring than women who are not vaccinated. Measles jab reduces inherited immunity


Waning of Maternal Antibodies Against Measles, Mumps, Rubella, and Varicella in Communities With Contrasting Vaccination Coverage

Conclusions. Children of mothers vaccinated against measles and, possibly, rubella have lower concentrations of maternal antibodies and lose protection by maternal antibodies at an earlier age than children of mothers in communities that oppose vaccination. This increases the risk of disease transmission in highly vaccinated populations.

Protective Effect of Childhood Measles Against Degenerative Diseases in Later Life

The above study indicates that a lack of rash in measles is associated with an increased incidence of autoimmune and degenerative diseases in later life. As the rash is the means through which the toxin is expelled from the body, its absence leads to the measles virus remaining in the body. The widespread use of vaccination has led to the appearance of “atypical measles” and “mild measles” where no rash develops. This can expose children to diseases in later life.


Measles Virus Infection Without Rash In Childhood Is Related To Disease In Adult Life.
The Lancet, January 5 1985

The presence of measles specific antibodies is usually taken as evidence of typical measles in the past; in the present study it was regarded as evidence of infection with measles virus, but not necessarily of the common disease accompanied by a typical rash. The association between a negative history of measles in childhood and certain diseases later in life was investigated by a historical prospective method, based on school health records combined with self-reporting in adulthood, and tests for specific IgG measles antibody. There was evidence of association between a negative history of measles, exposure in early life (possibly injection of immune serum globulin after exposure), and development of immunoreactive diseases, sebaceous skin diseases, degenerative diseases of bone and cartilage, and certain tumours. It is suggested that the presence of measles virus specific antibodies at the time of acute infection interferes with development of specific cytolytic reactions, and enables intracellular measles virus to survive the acute infection. If this hypothesis is verified, use of immune serum globulin after measles exposure has to be reconsidered.


Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1995 Jul;149(7):774-8.
Mumps outbreak in a highly vaccinated school population. Evidence for large-scale vaccination failure.

Public Health Officials Know: Recently Vaccinated Individuals Spread Disease

Washington, D.C., March 3, 2015 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Physicians and public health officials know that recently vaccinated individuals can spread disease and that contact with the immunocompromised can be especially dangerous. For example, the Johns Hopkins Patient Guide warns the immunocompromised to “Avoid contact with children who are recently vaccinated,” and to “Tell friends and family who are sick, or have recently had a live vaccine (such as chicken pox, measles, rubella, intranasal influenza, polio or smallpox) not to visit.”1

A statement on the website of St. Jude’s Hospital warns parents not to allow people to visit children undergoing cancer treatment if they have received oral polio or smallpox vaccines within four weeks, have received the nasal flu vaccine within one week, or have rashes after receiving the chickenpox vaccine or MMR (measles, mumps, rubella) vaccine.2

“The public health community is blaming unvaccinated children for the outbreak of measles at Disneyland, but the illnesses could just as easily have occurred due to contact with a recently vaccinated individual,” says Sally Fallon Morell, president of the Weston A. Price Foundation. The Foundation promotes a healthy diet, non-toxic lifestyle and freedom of medical choice for parents and their children. “Evidence indicates that recently vaccinated individuals should be quarantined in order to protect the public.”

Scientific evidence demonstrates that individuals vaccinated with live virus vaccines such as MMR (measles, mumps and rubella), rotavirus, chicken pox, shingles and influenza can shed the virus for many weeks or months afterwards and infect the vaccinated and unvaccinated alike. 3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10.11.12

Furthermore, vaccine recipients can carry diseases in the back of their throat and infect others while displaying no symptoms of a disease.13,14,15

Both unvaccinated and vaccinated individuals are at risk from exposure to those recently vaccinated. Vaccine failure is widespread; vaccine-induced immunity is not permanent and recent outbreaks of diseases such as whooping cough, mumps and measles have occurred in fully vaccinated populations.16,17 Flu vaccine recipients become more susceptible to future infection after repeated vaccination.18,19

Adults have contracted polio from recently vaccinated infants. A father from Staten Island ended up in a wheel chair after contracting polio while changing his daughter’s diaper. He received a 22.5 million dollar award in 2009. 20,21

“Vaccine failure and failure to acknowledge that live virus vaccines can spread disease have resulted in an increase in outbreaks of infectious disease in both vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals,” says Leslie Manookian, producer of The Greater Good. “CDC should instruct physicians who administer vaccinations to inform their patients about the risks posed to others by those who’ve been recently vaccinated.”

According to the Weston A. Price Foundation, the best protection against infectious disease is a healthy immune system, supported by adequate vitamin A and vitamin C. Well-nourished children easily recover from infectious disease and rarely suffer complications.


And do you know how the pro-vaccine side has always maintained that vaccines do not shed, and that there is no existing significant issue with that? They claim that the un-vaccinated are a risk to the vaccinated? How could that be if vaccines work? They as well spout the term of and the needed for vaccine derived herd immunity, for vaccines to work; and no matter how unscientific that claim is and/or may be. Clearly none of those claims have any merit!


Avoid live virus vaccines and people who have received one

Some vaccines are made from live viruses. Currently, these include oral polio, smallpox, MMR (measles, mumps, and rubella), and nasal flu vaccines.

These vaccines may pose a threat to your child’s health. Any person with a weakened immune system, including patients with cancer or HIV infection should not receive live virus vaccines.

Do not allow people to visit your child if:

They have received oral polio or smallpox vaccines within 4 weeks;

They have received the nasal flu vaccine within one (1) week; or

They have rashes after receiving the chickenpox (varicella) vaccine or MMR (measles, mumps, rubella) vaccine.

Looks like St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital did not take the page down, but rather, they changed the URL (website address). So, those who kept the old link could not find it, although it is still on cached.


Previously it stated:

Page 113
Revised / Reviewed 6/12

Can I have visitors?

• Tell friends and family who are sick, or have recently had a live vaccine (such as chicken pox, measles, rubella, intranasal influenza, polio or smallpox) not to visit.

• It may be a good idea to have visitors call first.

• Avoid contact with children who were recently vaccinated.


Vaccine Epidemic: How Corporate Greed, Biased Science, and Coercive Government Threaten Our Human Rights, Our Health, and Our Children (Google eBook)

National polls show that Americans are increasingly concerned about vaccine safety and the right to make individual, informed choices together with their healthcare practitioners. Vaccine Epidemic focuses on the searing debate surrounding individual and parental vaccination choice in the United States. Featuring more than twenty experts from the fields of ethics, law, science, medicine, business, and history, Vaccine Epidemic urgently calls for reform. It is the essential handbook for the vaccination choice movement and required reading for all people contemplating vaccination for themselves and their children. Louise Kuo Habakus and Mary Holland edit and introduce a diverse array of interrelated topics concerning the explosive vaccine controversy, including:

• The human right to vaccination choice
• The ethics and constitutionality of vaccination mandates
• Personal narratives of parents, children, and soldiers who have suffered vaccine injury
• Vaccine safety science and evidence-based medicine
• Corrupting conflicts of interest in the national vaccine program
• What should parents do? A review of eight advice books on vaccines that span the gamut.


More science and information.

Vaccine. 2008 Mar 25;26(14):1725-30. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.01.041. Epub 2008 Feb 13.
Kinetics of asthma- and allergy-associated immune response gene expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from vaccinated infants after in vitro re-stimulation with vaccine antigen.
Lahdenperä AI1, Nilsson LJ, Regnström K.


The global expression of immune response genes in infants after vaccination and their role in asthma and allergy is not clearly understood. Pharmacogenomics is ideally suited to study the involved cellular responses, since the expression of thousands of genes can be assessed simultaneously. Here, array technology was used to assess the expression kinetics of immune response genes with association to asthma and allergy in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) of five healthy infants after vaccination with Infanrix-Polio+Hib. At 12h after in vitro re-stimulation of the PBMC with pertussis toxin (PT) antigen, 14 immune response pathways, 33 allergy-related and 66 asthma-related genes were found activated.

Is Infant Immunization a Risk Factor for Childhood Asthma or Allergy?

Epidemiology. 1997 Nov;8(6):678-80.
Is infant immunization a risk factor for childhood asthma or allergy?
Kemp T1, Pearce N, Fitzharris P, Crane J, Fergusson D, St George I, Wickens K, Beasley R.

The Christchurch Health and Development Study comprises 1,265 children born in 1977. The 23 children who received no diphtheria/pertussis/tetanus (DPT) and polio immunizations had no recorded asthma episodes or consultations for asthma or other allergic illness before age 10 years; in the immunized children, 23.1% had asthma episodes, 22.5% asthma consultations, and 30.0% consultations for other allergic illness. Similar differences were observed at ages 5 and 16 years. These findings do not appear to be due to differential use of health services (although this possibility cannot be excluded) or con-founding by ethnicity, socioeconomic status, parental atopy, or parental smoking.


Measles outbreaks can occur in highly vaccinated populations, even when there is a 100% vaccination rate.

“We found 18 reports of measles outbreaks in very highly immunized school populations where 71% to 99.8% of students were immunized against measles. Despite these high rates of immunization, 30% to 100% (mean, 77%) of all measles cases in these outbreaks occurred in previously immunized students.”

Arch Intern Med. 1994 Aug 22;154(16):1815-20.
Failure to reach the goal of measles elimination. Apparent paradox of measles infections in immunized persons.
Poland GA1, Jacobson RM.

The apparent paradox is that as measles immunization rates rise to high levels in a population, measles becomes a disease of immunized persons. Because of the failure rate of the vaccine and the unique transmissibility of the measles virus, the currently available measles vaccine, used in a single-dose strategy, is unlikely to completely eliminate measles. The long-term success of a two-dose strategy to eliminate measles remains to be determined.



Vaccine. 2008 Mar 25;26(14):1725-30. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.01.041. Epub 2008 Feb 13.
Kinetics of asthma- and allergy-associated immune response gene expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from vaccinated infants after in vitro re-stimulation with vaccine antigen.
Lahdenperä AI1, Nilsson LJ, Regnström K.


The global expression of immune response genes in infants after vaccination and their role in asthma and allergy is not clearly understood. Pharmacogenomics is ideally suited to study the involved cellular responses, since the expression of thousands of genes can be assessed simultaneously. Here, array technology was used to assess the expression kinetics of immune response genes with association to asthma and allergy in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) of five healthy infants after vaccination with Infanrix-Polio+Hib. At 12h after in vitro re-stimulation of the PBMC with pertussis toxin (PT) antigen, 14 immune response pathways, 33 allergy-related and 66 asthma-related genes were found activated.


Is Infant Immunization a Risk Factor for Childhood Asthma or Allergy?

Epidemiology. 1997 Nov;8(6):678-80.
Is infant immunization a risk factor for childhood asthma or allergy?
Kemp T1, Pearce N, Fitzharris P, Crane J, Fergusson D, St George I, Wickens K, Beasley R.

The Christchurch Health and Development Study comprises 1,265 children born in 1977. The 23 children who received no diphtheria/pertussis/tetanus (DPT) and polio immunizations had no recorded asthma episodes or consultations for asthma or other allergic illness before age 10 years; in the immunized children, 23.1% had asthma episodes, 22.5% asthma consultations, and 30.0% consultations for other allergic illness. Similar differences were observed at ages 5 and 16 years. These findings do not appear to be due to differential use of health services (although this possibility cannot be excluded) or con-founding by ethnicity, socioeconomic status, parental atopy, or parental smoking.


Immunological findings in autism.
Review article

Comments on and regarding this study:

“MMR antibodies are significantly higher in autistic children as compared to normal children, supporting a role of MMR in autism.”

This also fits with the recent study showing higher antibodies to MMR in children of African descent, which means they would be more likely to develop autism, which in turn is supported by the 2004 CDC study where the data indicated a higher risk of autism in African American males.



This study looked at measles antibody titers in college students before and after an outbreak in a highly-vaccinated population. (Boston College had just done a blood drive, so blood samples prior to the outbreak were available for 80 students.) The study shows the following:

(1) about 10% of the students had antibody titers too low to prevent infections, and 7 out of 8 students with low titers actually got the measles with spots;
(2) about 10% of the students had subclinical measles with increased antibodies so would have been able to spread the virus;
(3) over 50% of the students had at least one symptom of the measles, even without full clinical presentation, so might have been able to spread the virus.

“The study suggests that PRN titers less than or equal to 120 were not protective against measles disease and illness without rash due to measles may occur in persons with PRN titers above this level.”

J Infect Dis. 1990 Nov;162(5):1036-42.
Measles antibody: reevaluation of protective titers.


A school blood drive before a measles outbreak permitted correlation of preexposure measles antibody titers with clinical protection using the plaque reduction neutralization (PRN) test and an EIA. Of 9 donors with detectable preexposure PRN titer less than or equal to 120, 8 met the clinical criteria for measles (7 seroconfirmed) compared with none of 71 with preexposure PRN titers greater than 120 (P less than .0001). Seven of 11 donors with preexposure PRN titers of 216-874 had a greater than or equal to 4-fold rise in antibody titer (mean, 43-fold) compared with none of 7 with a preexposure PRN titer greater than or equal to 1052 (P less than .02). Of 37 noncases with preexposure PRN titer less than 1052, 26 (70%) reported one or more symptoms compared with 11 (31%) of 35 donors with preexposure PRN titers greater than or equal to 1052 (P less than .002). By EIA, no case had detectable preexposure antibody; the preexposure geometric mean titer of asymptomatic donors (220) was not significantly higher than that of symptomatic donors who did not meet the clinical criteria for measles (153) (P = .10). The study suggests that PRN titers less than or equal to 120 were not protective against measles disease and illness without rash due to measles may occur in persons with PRN titers above this level.



This peer-reviewed research predicts measles epidemics in fully-vaccinated populations, starting about 50 years after the start of mass vaccination (in other words, right about now). The problem with vaccination is that (1) infants are too young to vaccinate, (2) not all vaccinated people acquire immunity, and (3) immunity wanes over time. The result over time is a larger and larger population of susceptible individuals, and the likelihood of outbreaks.



There is a genetic basis for the response to vaccination. Not all children respond the same way, some have a much higher risk of injury. Shouldn’t we understand these issues and test children before we vaccinate them?
“Genetic polymorphisms in genes expressing an enzyme previously associated with adverse reactions to a variety of pharmacologic agents (MTHFR) and an immunological transcription factor (IRF1) were associated with AEs [Adverse Events] after smallpox vaccination in 2 independent study samples.”


Two radical changes to the diagnosis of polio were made by the CDC in 1955 – right after the vaccine was licensed – which had the immediate effect of eliminating 85% of the cases of polio that would thenceforth be reported annually to the American public. That’s not disease eradication; it’s a con game. A million cases of what would have been diagnosed as polio pre-vaccine – same symptoms – have been given different labels over the last sixty years.


Despite Exuberance Many Vaccines Do Far More Harm Than Good

Excerpted: Things, however, may be be far worse than reported…

A highly concerning paper published in the April-June issue of the Indian Journal of Medical Ethics discusses the possibility that the 47,500 new cases of “non-polio acute flaccid paralysis (NPAFP)” in children reported in 2011, which is clinically indistinguishable from polio paralysis but twice as deadly, were directly proportional [i.e. casually linked] to doses of oral polio received.  According to the authors of this paper: “Though this data was collected within the polio surveillance system, it was not investigated. The principle of primum-non-nocere [First, do no harm] was violated.” In other words, instead of acknowledging the high prevalence of vaccine-associated polio paralysis (VAPP), those administering the vaccines and doing surveillance on adverse events simply reclassified the symptoms of injury from polio vaccine to non-vaccine related by coining a new disease terminology, i.e. “non-polio acute flaccid paralysis (NPAFP),” which describes essentially the same symptoms. When one considers the scale of Indian eradication campaign, 47,500 cases of NPAFP, while immense, are within the realm of feasibility. According to the article:

The government of India used 2.3 million vaccinators, who visited over 200 million households to ensure that the nearly 170 million children (under five years in age) were repeatedly immunised with oral polio vaccine.

If the 47,500 case figure for NPAFP is correct, the actual scale of vaccine-related adverse effects associated with oral polio vaccine are probably 2-3 orders of magnitude higher than officially reported by the governmental and non-governmental agencies promoting their use, and by those agencies who are responsible for monitoring and reporting their adverse effects.

Cases like this illustrate how important it is that we all take a critical look at the first-hand vaccine statistics and research itself, reading between the lines when the lines have been intentionally manipulated and the truth obfuscated. For several years, our ongoing project has dedicated itself to providing the research community an alternative medical and toxicological resource for ascertaining the true risks and/or unintended consequences of conventional medical interventions such as vaccinations.


Regarding the article:

Int J Health Serv. 1989;19(2):181-208.
A review of the evidence concerning the impact of medical measures on recent mortality and morbidity in the United States.

In this article we examine the contribution of medical measures to recent mortality changes in coronary heart disease, cancer, and stroke, which together account for two-thirds of total U.S. mortality and consume the vast majority of available resources. Morbidity changes are also examined and found to be not declining in a manner congruent with mortality and, in fact, increasing for some subgroups. Using a combined measure of mortality and morbidity (the probability of a life free of disability), it is demonstrated that although overall life expectancy has increased over several decades, most of this increase is in years of disability.


So if vaccinations did not eliminate infectious diseases, what did? The answer is modern sanitation, with clean water, toilets, and closed sewage systems, plus better nutrition. As living conditions improved, mortality rates for all infectious diseases dropped dramatically, typically before any vaccine was introduced. Many diseases, such as scarlet fever, disappeared without any mass vaccination program.

For smallpox specifically, Dr Suzanne Humphries and Roman Bystrianyk’s write:
“…compulsory vaccination did nothing to curb the problem of smallpox. …more people died in the 20 years after the strict Massachusetts vaccination compulsory laws than in the 20 years before.”

For a fascinating history of vaccination, read Dr Suzanne Humphries and Roman Bystrianyk’s excellent book, Dissolving Illusions.


Paul Offit’s vaccine lies deconstructed: A mind-blowing interview with Dr. Suzanne Humphries


This peer-reviewed research predicts measles epidemics in fully-vaccinated populations, starting about 50 years after the start of mass vaccination (in other words, right about now). The problem with vaccination is that (1) infants are too young to vaccinate, (2) not all vaccinated people acquire immunity, and (3) immunity wanes over time. The result over time is a larger and larger population of susceptible individuals, and the likelihood of outbreaks.

Implications of vaccination and waning immunity
J.M. Heffernan , M.J. Keeling
Published 23 April 2009


For infectious diseases where immunization can offer lifelong protection, a variety of simple models can be used to explain the utility of vaccination as a control method. However, for many diseases, immunity wanes over time and is subsequently enhanced (boosted) by asymptomatic encounters with the infection. The study of this type of epidemiological process requires a model formulation that can capture both the within-host dynamics of the pathogen and immune system as well as the associated population-level transmission dynamics. Here, we parametrize such a model for measles and show how vaccination can have a range of unexpected consequences as it reduces the natural boosting of immunity as well as reducing the number of naive susceptibles. In particular, we show that moderate waning times (40–80 years) and high levels of vaccination (greater than 70%) can induce large-scale oscillations with substantial numbers of symptomatic cases being generated at the peak. In addition, we predict that, after a long disease-free period, the introduction of infection will lead to far larger epidemics than that predicted by standard models. These results have clear implications for the long-term success of any vaccination campaign and highlight the need for a sound understanding of the immunological mechanisms of immunity and vaccination.




[Morbidity changes are also examined and found to be not declining in a manner congruent with mortality and, in fact, increasing for some subgroups. Using a combined measure of mortality and morbidity (the probability of a life free of disability), it is demonstrated that although overall life expectancy has increased over several decades, most of this increase is in years of disability.]

Int J Health Serv. 1989;19(2):181-208.
A review of the evidence concerning the impact of medical measures on recent mortality and morbidity in the United States.
McKinlay JB1, McKinlay SM, Beaglehole R.


Because it still is widely believed that one deadly disease after another is being eliminated, or diminished, largely because of medical interventions, there is little commitment to social change and even resistance to a reordering of national priorities. In this article we examine the contribution of medical measures to recent mortality changes in coronary heart disease, cancer, and stroke, which together account for two-thirds of total U.S. mortality and consume the vast majority of available resources. Morbidity changes are also examined and found to be not declining in a manner congruent with mortality and, in fact, increasing for some subgroups. Using a combined measure of mortality and morbidity (the probability of a life free of disability), it is demonstrated that although overall life expectancy has increased over several decades, most of this increase is in years of disability. Our late 20th century approach to the emerging AIDS pandemic (the frantic search for a “magic bullet”–either a treatment or a vaccine) belies any suggestion that the arguments and data presented concerning the modest contribution of medical measures are now passé.



Prog Health Sci 2012, Vol 2 , No1 Neurologic adverse events vaccination
Neurologic adverse events following vaccination
Sienkiewicz D.*, Kułak W., Okurowska-Zawada B., Paszko-Patej G.
Department of Pediatric Rehabilitation of the Medical University of Bialystok, Poland


The present review summarizes data on
neurological adverse events following vaccination
in the relation to intensity, time of onset, taking into
account the immunological and non-immunological
mechanisms. The authors described the physiological
development of the immune system and the
possible immune system responses following
vaccination. Toxic property of thimerosal – a
mercury-containing preservative used in some
vaccines was presented. The neurological complications
after vaccination were described. The role
of vaccination in the natural course of infectious
diseases and the current immunizations schedule in
Poland was discussed.

Professor Majewska – a neurobiologist,
Director of the Marie Curie Chairs Program at the
Department of Pharmacology and Physiology of the
Nervous System in Warsaw – together with
pediatricians, drafted a proposal for changes to the
vaccination program in Poland, which is based on
an analysis of programs in other European Union
countries. The propositions are as follows:

1. Eliminate thimerosal from all vaccines.

2. Discontinue the immunization of infants with
the hepatitis B vaccine (vaccinate only
newborns at high risk, i.e. of infected

3. Discontinue BCG vaccination of neonates (use
only in children from regions where the

percentage of TB patients is over 40 per 100

4. Begin vaccination from 4 months old in the
remaining group of children.

5. Discontinue the whole cell pertussis vaccine.
6. Give a maximum of three types of vaccines in
one day.

7. Discontinue the administration of live virus
vaccines or give them one at a time at safe

8. Make monovalent vaccines accessible.

9. Commitment of the doctor administering the
vaccine to conduct a preliminary interview
with the parents about allergies, asthma and
other autoimmune diseases and postvaccinal
complications in family members, allowing
them to predict whether a given child may
experience severe postvaccinal reactions. Such
a child should have an individual, very careful
vaccination program developed.

10. Monitor the health status of children after
vaccination in order to notice life- or healththreatening
conditions in time.

11. Create a national program for compulsory
registration of postvaccinal complications and
deaths. These data should be reported to the
WHO and information about complications
should be provided in the child’s health record
book [51].


Despite the assurances of the necessity and
safety of vaccinations, there are more and more
questions and doubts, which both physicians and
parents are waiting to be clarified. This paper
describes several aspects of the immunization
program of children. It includes: the physiological
development of the immune system, the
immunization schedule adopted in Poland in
comparison with other countries, adverse reactions
and complications following vaccination described
in scientific publications, the natural course of
infectious diseases in conjunction with the
vaccination programs implemented and the problem
of reporting adverse reactions following
vaccination by medical personnel and parents. The
proposal for changes in vaccination in Poland cited
at the end of this paper is, according to the authors,
part of the answer to the concerns and doubts. A
second part would be extensive neuroimmunological
research confirming or excluding
the relationship of vaccines with the reported
adverse events (early, late/long-term) and chronic
diseases whose upward trend has been observed in
recent decades in children.

It seems that it would be worthwhile to
apply the precautionary principle – the ethical
principle (from 1988) according to which if there is
a probable, although poorly known, risk of adverse
effects of new technology, it is better not to
implement it rather than risk uncertain but
potentially very harmful consequences.

Hollistic Doctors Killed